Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289 vs UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
Which of these exact models better fits the ports and per-port output profiles their devices call for, and how much carry weight matters?
Products compared
ASIN B09VPHVT2Z
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289
A device you plan to connect to Anker USB-C2 calls for a listed profile above UGREEN’s 65W C2 maximum, and you have checked the simultaneous-output table for your exact device combination.
Last observed offer
$98.99
List Price: $109.99
Price checked
Observed offer ends
Observed condition: new. Coupon and subscription requirements unverified.
ASIN B0BJQ7F16T
UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
You value the lower manufacturer-listed weight and your planned devices fit the UGREEN’s published per-port ceilings.
Last observed offer
$69.99
List Price: $99.99
- Prime membership required
Size: 160*81*27 mm
Price checked
Observed condition: new. Coupon and subscription requirements unverified.
Prices are per listed package. Pickoryx may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through the paid Amazon links on this page, at no added cost to you.
Published by Pickoryx · Published 2026-10-19 · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
The main trade-off
The Anker lists a 140W maximum on each USB-C port, within a 140W total-output cap; the UGREEN lists 140W on C1 and 65W on C2, while weighing less in its published specification.
Quick verdict
Choose by your device plan first: Anker lists up to 140W on either USB-C port individually, with a 140W total-output cap; UGREEN lists up to 140W on C1 and 65W on C2. UGREEN’s published weight is 513 g versus 630 g for Anker. These ratings and weights do not establish real-world charging speed, simultaneous output, or usable battery runtime.
Choose Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289 if
- A device you plan to connect to Anker USB-C2 calls for a listed profile above UGREEN’s 65W C2 maximum, and you have checked the simultaneous-output table for your exact device combination.
Choose UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A if
- You value the lower manufacturer-listed weight and your planned devices fit the UGREEN’s published per-port ceilings.
When the recommendation changes
- Your actual devices need different USB-C profiles or simultaneous output combinations; check those against the manufacturers’ tables before buying.
- The 117 g listed weight difference matters less to you than the Anker’s stated second USB-C output profile.
The differences that matter
| Decision point | Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289 | UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A |
|---|---|---|
| Multi Device Port Planning | Two USB-C and one USB-A ports; both USB-C outputs list profiles up to 28V/5A; 140W maximum total output; USB-A up to 12V/1.5A.[1] | Two USB-C and one USB-A ports; C1 140W max, C2 65W max, USB-A 22.5W max.[3] |
What this changes: Compare the needed port and profile for each device; do not infer simultaneous delivery from individual maxima.[1, 3] The better fit depends on your priorities | ||
| Carry Weight | 630 g (22.22 oz).[1] | 513 g.[3] |
What this changes: UGREEN lists a 117 g lower unit weight; this is a specification difference, not an overall comfort test.[1, 3] Best fit: UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A | ||
Best for your routine
A planned device needs a USB-C output profile above 65W on the bank’s second USB-C port.
Best fit: Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
Anker lists up to 140W maximum on USB-C2 individually, while UGREEN lists up to 65W maximum on C2. Confirm the device’s required profile and simultaneous-output table before purchase; this is not a claim of measured charging speed.
The buyer prioritizes the lower published unit weight.
Best fit: UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
UGREEN lists 513 g versus Anker’s 630 g. This is a specification-based weight choice, not a measured comfort or overall portability result.
Value and trade-offs
One or both observed offers have eligibility conditions, so no unrestricted price difference is shown.
Because displayed offers change, compare current prices against the output profile or carry-weight trade-off that matters to your setup; this draft does not embed a price or claim a value winner.
Only current offer observations were available for this draft; there is not enough price history to recommend buying now or waiting.
Limitations
- Manufacturer maximum wattage is not a measurement of charge time or device performance. Actual results depend on the device, cable, protocol negotiation, and the power bank’s multi-port behavior.
- The exact simultaneous-output allocation was not used to rank either product; verify the official table against your intended combination.
- Anker support documentation names additional display fields including screen time, battery cycle, battery health, total input, and total output. UGREEN’s US product page says its LED display shows remaining power; that page does not establish whether other readouts are absent. Treat display detail as unresolved for a direct winner.
- No hands-on test, runtime test, or independent controlled comparison was conducted.
Questions shoppers ask
Do both power banks have the same port types?
Their manufacturer pages list two USB-C ports and one USB-A port each. The per-port maximums differ: Anker lists 140W maximum on both USB-C ports individually, while UGREEN lists 140W on C1 and 65W on C2. Check the multi-port tables for simultaneous use.
Which display shows more information?
Anker’s support page names screen-time, battery-cycle, battery-health, total-input, and total-output fields. UGREEN’s US page describes an LED display showing remaining power. That wording does not prove UGREEN lacks additional readouts, so the available sources do not settle a direct display-feature winner.
Methodology and sources
Compared the exact A1289 and PB205/90597A identities against their manufacturer product pages and Anker support documentation, focusing on per-port output profiles and listed unit weight; display documentation is treated only as an unresolved side question.
AI assistance was used to organize the sources and compare the listed specifications; no product testing was performed.
View 3 sources
- 1.Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)Anker US · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Specifications: USB-C1/USB-C2 output profiles and 140W total output; dimensions and weight; FAQ display-field labels.: Names the Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), lists 24,000mAh, two USB-C and one USB-A port, USB-C1 input profiles up to 28V/5A, each USB-C output profile up to 28V/5A, 140W maximum total output, USB-A output profiles, dimensions and 630 g weight. Page FAQ names the display labels.
- 2.Why is “Screen Time”, “Battery Cycle”, “Total Input”, and “Total Output” not showing “0” on the Anker 737 PowerBank’s display?Anker Support · Official support · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Article title and opening body; explicitly discusses the Anker 737 PowerBank display fields.: Anker support explains the screen-time, battery-cycle, battery-health, total-input and total-output fields. Supports that these fields are documented for the Anker 737, not an accuracy or performance claim.
- 3.145W 3 Ports 25000mAh Power Bank for LaptopUGREEN US · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Specs table, SKU 90597A: capacity, output, input, ports, dimensions, weight, and display; page description says LED display shows remaining power.: The US product page specifies SKU 90597A, 25,000mAh, 140W max USB-C1, 65W max USB-C2, 22.5W max USB-A, 65W max USB-C1 input, two USB-C plus one USB-A, dimensions 160×80×26 mm, weight 513 g, and an LED display; page copy says it shows remaining power.