Skip to content

Best picks for your needs

Product comparisons to help you choose.

Showing 1–8 of 8 · Page 1 of 1

Anker 737 A1289

ASIN B09VPHVT2Z

A1695

ASIN B0DCBB2YTR

Electronics & accessories

Anker 737 A1289 vs A1695: Which Cable and Output Setup Fits?

Choose by the connections you will actually use. The A1289 lists two USB-C socket ports and one USB-A port, with a 140W total maximum and a USB-C profile up to 28V/5A; Anker says reaching 140W requires a PD 3.1 device and cable.

Read comparison

Anker A110A

ASIN B0F66LNB8D

A1695

ASIN B0DCBB2YTR

Electronics & accessories

Anker A110A vs A1695: Which Power-Bank Workflow Fits Your Gear?

A1695 is a fit if you prioritize its maker-documented built-in USB-C cables. A110A may fit if its USB-C/USB-A port mix and app controls match your devices, particularly when you already have the specified dual-input chargers and cables.

Read comparison

Anker A1695

ASIN B0DCBB2YTR

UGREEN 35525

ASIN B0CXHM5RY2

Electronics & accessories

Anker A1695 vs UGREEN 35525: Output Headroom, Ports and Travel Fit

Choose Anker A1695 for an integrated-cable, three-USB-C/four-port workflow with a documented 165W maximum, subject to its lower three/four-device combined ceiling. Choose UGREEN 35525 for the higher manufacturer-labeled total output, 140W USB-C1 and TFT format.

Read comparison

Belkin BPB039

ASIN B0GXX52D5Y

Anker A1695

ASIN B0DCBB2YTR

Electronics & accessories

Belkin BPB039 vs Anker A1695: Which 25K Power Bank Fits Your Setup?

BPB039 publishes the higher single USB-C output ceiling, while A1695 offers two built-in USB-C cables and a two-USB-C mode rated up to 165W. Their three-device shared-output figures are different manufacturer maxima for different port layouts, not proof of faster real-world charging.

Read comparison